This is an outdated version published on 2022-02-02. Read the most recent version.

Ways out from Crisis and New Welfare Models

Authors

  • Gonzalo Daniel Martner Fanta Director of the Centre of Studies for Development Policies, Faculty of Administration and Economy, USACH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35588/pp.v14i2.5402

Keywords:

Crisis, Welfare models, Mixed economy, Technological revolution, Circular economy

Abstract

It is argued that nowadays at least five effects are combined in society that requires political answers: the global economic crisis consequences on inequality, the climate change, new viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, a new technologic phase and a crisis of representation. To address these effects a new Democratic Welfare State 3.0 is proposed that guarantee the provision of fundamental goods, improve the subordinate condition of women, based on a mixed economy that operates on an “inverse subsidiary” principle. This new phase should amend workers participation in corporations, that the core of economy is meant to be full employment, finish with the “capitalism of heirs”, and create a Deconcentration and Sustainability Fund, among another five allocation logics proposed. Moreover, fourth industrial revolution risks and opportunities should be considered and address this transformation on a mixed manner -for example through technological missions-, democratically, and circular. The paper concludes proposing a decalogue of policy redefinitions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D. (5 de junio de 2020). The post Covid State. Project Syndicate. Recuperado el 20 de diciembre de 2021, de https://www.project-syndicate.org/onpoint/four-possible-trajectories-after-covid19-daron-acemoglu-2020-06

Denzin, C., Cálix, A., y Martner, G. D. (2019). Esto no da para maÌs. Hacia la transformacioÌn social-ecoloÌgica en AmeÌrica Latina. MeÌxico, FundacioÌn Friedrich Ebert.

Dube, A. (2019). Minimum Wages and the Distribution of Family Incomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 268-304. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170085 268.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2020). Green cities Action Programme: building back better. Recuperado el 20 de diciembre de 2021, de https://www.fao.org/3/cb0848en/cb0848en.pdf

Manning, A. (2021). The Elusive Employment Effect of the Minimum Wage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.1.3.

Mazzucato, M., y Penna, C. (2020). La era de las misiones ¿CoÌmo abordar los desafiÌos sociales mediante poliÌticas de innovacioÌn orientadas por misiones en AmeÌrica Latina y el Caribe?. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/La-era-de-las-misiones-Como-abordar-los-desafios-sociales-mediante-politicas-de-innovacion-orientadas-por-misiones-en-America-Latina-y-el-Caribe.pdf

Morin, E. (2011). La vía para el futuro de la humanidad. PaidoÌs.

Piketty, T. (2019). Capital e IdeologiÌa. PaidoÌs.

Scheuer, F., y Slemrod, J. (2021). Taxing our Wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.1.207.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-02

Versions

Issue

Section

Main Body