This is an outdated version published on 2020-08-31. Read the most recent version.

ASYLUM AND SAFE COUNTRY POLICIES IN EUROPE: LESSONS FOR THE DEBATE ON THE DESIGNATION OF MEXICO AND GUATEMALA AS THIRD SECURE COUNTRIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35588/rhsm.v24i1.4029

Keywords:

Safe Country Policies, Safe Third Country, Mexico, Guatemala

Abstract

The following article analyses the conceptual and historical development of safe country policies in Europe since the 1980s. The article discusses the main issues associated with the creation and use of safe country policies as instruments for declaring inadmissible or dismissing the merits of an asylum claim. Although the European countries sought to streamline asylum procedures by designating more countries as safe, these efforts have failed because the execution and coordination of safe country policies are also convoluted and time consuming. In the light of the European experience, the article concludes that the US objective of labelling Mexico and Guatemala as safe third countries will hardly release pressure from their asylum system due to practical difficulties that Europe’s experience has shown from a long time ago. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, Caroline. The limits of communitarisation and the legacy of intergovernmentalism: EU asylum governance and the evolution of the Dublin system. PhD Thesis, 2016, etheses.lse.ac.uk/3417/

Bräuninger, Dieter. “Reform of the Common European Asylum System: a difficult undertaking”. Deutsches Bank Research, Working Paper, 2018, pp. 1-12, ISSN (Online): 1612-0280.

Byrne, Rosemary & Andrew Shacknove. “The Safe Country Notion in European Asylum Law”. Harvard Human Rights Journal, vol. 7, 1996, pp. 185-228.

Chimni, B. “Aid, Relief, and Containment: The First Asylum Country and Beyond”. International Migration, vol. 40, no. 5, 2002, pp. 76-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00212

Consejo Europeo. “Reforma de las normas de la UE en materia de asilo”. www.consilium.europa.eu/es/policies/ceas-reform/

Crowhurst, Felipe. The politics of safe country designations in Europe: an analysis of how Albania and Kosovo became considered Safe Countries of Origin (SCO) in Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Graduate School of Social Sciences (GSSS), 2017.

Doomernik, Jeroen and María Bruquetas-Callejo. “National Immigration and Integration Policies in Europe Since 1973”. En Garcés-Mascareñas, B. y Penninx, R. (eds), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe Contexts, Levels and Actors, 2016, Ch.4, pp. 57-66. Editorial Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21674-4_4

DW. “Kosovo and Montenegro favor >>safe country of origin<< status”. 04 de agosto de 2015, www.dw.com/en/kosovo-and-montenegro-favor-safe-country-of-origin-status/a-18626363

EASO. EASO Annual Activity Report - Part I. 2012, publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6d92e264-c500-4e40-ae34-4eb18bfadfe6

ECRE. “Safe countries of origin”: A safe concept? Septiembre 2015, www.ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/AIDA-Third-Legal-Briefing_Safe-Country-of-Origin.pdf

---. “Admissibility, responsibility and safety in European asylum procedures”. Agosto de 2016, www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/shadowreports/admissibility_responsibility_and_safety_in_european_asylum_procedures.pdf

ELENA. The application of the safe country of origin concept in Europe. ECRE, 2005.

EMN. Ad-Hoc Query on the concept of safe country of origin in relation to Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia (FYROM), Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Marzo de 2015, www.emn.fi/files/1170/OPEN_Compilation_FI_EMN_Ad-Hoc_Query_safe_country_of_origin_050215.pdf

Engelmann, Claudia. “Convergence against the Odds: The Development of Safe Country of Origin Policies in EU Member”. European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 16, pp. 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342056

---. Common Standards via the Backdoor: The Domestic Impact of Asylum Policy Coordination in the European Union. PhD Thesis, Marzo de 2015, cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/portal/files/1265336/guid-d021fe5c-7c40-4ecf ab26058a418bb07b-ASSET1.0

European Union. UNHCR's Position on a Harmonized Approach to Questions Concerning Host Third Countries. Diciembre de 1992, www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b31d47.html

---. UNHCR's Position on Manifestly Unfounded Applications for Asylum. 30 de noviembre de 1992, www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b31d83.html

---. Conclusions on Countries in Which There is Generally No Serious Risk of Persecution ("London Resolution"). 30 de noviembre de 1992, www.refworld.org/docid/3f86c6ee4.html

Fratzke, Susan. “International Experience Suggests Safe Third-Country Agreement Would Not Solve the U.S.-Mexico Border Crisis”. Migration Policy Institute, junio de 2019, www.migrationpolicy.org/news/safe-third-country-agreement-would-not-solve-us-mexico-border-crisis

Gil-Bazo, María Teresa. “The Safe Third Country Concept in International Agreements on Refugee Protection”. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, vol. 31, no. 1, 2015, pp. 42-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411503300104

Goodwin-Gill, G. S. “Safe country? Says who?” International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 4, no. 2, 1992, pp. 248-250. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/4.2.248

Hailbronner, Kay. “The concept of safe country and expeditious asylum procedures: A Western European perspective”. International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 5, no. 1, 1993, pp. 31-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/5.1.31

Harvey, Colin. “Time for reform? Refugees, asylum-seekers, and protection under international human rights law”. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 2014, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdu018

Hunt, Michael. The Safe Country of Origin Concept in European Asylum Law: Past, Present and Future. International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 26, no. 4, 2014, pp. 500-535. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeu052

Kjaerum, Morten. “The Concept of Country of First Asylum”. International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 4, 1992, pp. 514-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/4.4.514

Martenson, H., & J. McCarthy. “‘In General, No Serious Risk of Persecution’: Safe Country of Origin Practices in Nine European States”. Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, 1998, pp. 304-325. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/11.3.304

Oakley, S. Accelerated Procedures for Asylum in the European Union. Abril de 2017, University of Sussex - Sussex Centre for Migration Research.

Reneman, Marcelle. “Speedy Asylum Procedures in the EU: Striking a Fair Balance Between the Need to Process Asylum Cases Efficiently and the Asylum Applicant’s EU Right to an Effective Remedy”. International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 25, no. 4, 2013, pp. 717-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet055

Roman, Emanuela et al. “Why Turkey is not a Safe Country?”. Statewatch Analysis, febrero de 2016, www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-283-why-turkey-is-nota-safe-country.pdf

Shearm Michael and Zolan Kanno-Youngs. “Most Migrants at Border with Mexico Would Be Denied Asylum Protections Under New Trump Rule”. The New York Times, 15 de julio de 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/07/15/us/politics/trump-asylum-rule.html

Thielemann, Eiko. “Does Policy Matter? On Governments' Attempts to Control Unwanted Migration”. ISSS Discussion Paper, no. 9, November 2003, pp. 2-36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.495631

---. “How Effective are National and EU Policies in the Area of Forced Migration?”. Refugee Survey Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 4, 2012, pp. 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hds017

Trauner, Florian. “Asylum policy: the EU’s ‘crises’ and the looming policy regime failure”. Journal of European Integration, vol. 38, no. 3, 2016, pp. 311-325, doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1140756

UNHCR. Note on Asylum. Agosto de 1979, www.unhcr.org/excom/scip/3ae68cd44/note-asylum.html

---. Problem of Refugees and Asylum-Seekers Who Move in an Irregular Manner from a Country in Which They Had Already Found Protection. Octubre de 1989, www.unhcr.org/excom/exconc/3ae68c4380/problem-refugees-asylumseekers-move-irregular-manner-country-already-found.html

---. Background Note on the Safe Country Concept and Refugee Status Background. 1991, www.unhcr.org/afr/excom/scip/3ae68ccec/background-note-safe-country-conceptrefugee-status.html

Van Mol, Christof and Helga de Valk. “Migration and Immigrants in Europe: A Historical and Demographic Perspective”. En Garcés-Mascareñas, B. y Penninx, R. (eds), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe Contexts, Levels and Actors, Ch. 3, pp. 31-56. Editorial Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21674-4_3

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

Versions

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 1 (2020): Archive and Historical Heritage

Section

Research Notes

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Historia Social y de las Mentalidades

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

ASYLUM AND SAFE COUNTRY POLICIES IN EUROPE: LESSONS FOR THE DEBATE ON THE DESIGNATION OF MEXICO AND GUATEMALA AS THIRD SECURE COUNTRIES. (2020). Revista De Historia Social Y De Las Mentalidades, 24(1), 451-476. https://doi.org/10.35588/rhsm.v24i1.4029