Quantum Panprotopsychism and the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35588/cc.v6d7860Keywords:
Consciousness, Panpsychism, Interpretations, Quantum Mechanics, OntologyAbstract
Given the multiplicity of interpretations of quantum mechanics that give rise to very different ontologies, it is worth asking whether it is possible to find criteria with some empirical basis that make some interpretations preferable to others. If empirical evidence were found for the existence of quantum systems in the brain such as those necessary to adopt a form of panpsychism that resolves the problems of combination of subjects, qualities, and structures recognized since the time of William James, their underlying ontologies would be favored by allowing us to account for our conscious experiences. Quantum panprotopsychism has proven particularly well-suited to addressing the combination problems of panpsychism. It is based on an ontology of states and events with clearly identified physical and phenomenal counterparts and would therefore be recognizable if these physical elements were part of brain function.. Such an ontology could provide criteria for preferring certain quantum interpretations over others. Here we will analyze the interpretations that would be favored or challenged by the ontology resulting from this form of panprotopsychism.
Downloads
References
Albert, D., Loewer, B. (1990). “Se busca vivo o muerto: dos intentos de resolver la paradoja de Schrödinger”. En Actas de la PSA 1990, vol. 1, A. Fine, M. Forbes y L. Wessels (eds.), East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, p. 277.
Bell, J. S. (1989). “Towards an Exact Quantum Mechanics”. En Themes in Contemporary Physics II, World Scientific, Singapore.
Bene, G., Dieks, D. (2002). “Una versión perspectiva de la interpretación modal de la mecánica cuántica y el origen del comportamiento macroscópico”. Foundations of Physics, 32: 645–671.
Bohm, D. (1952). “A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II”. Physical Review, 85(2): 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.166
Born, M. (2004). The Born–Einstein Letters 1916–1955. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, USA.
Brans, C. H. (1988). “Bell’s theorem does not eliminate fully causal hidden variables”. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 27(2): 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00670750
Chalmers, D. (1997). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Philosophy of Mind). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Chalmers, D. (2016a). “The Combination Problem for Panpsychism”. En G. Bruntrup y L. Jaskola (eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Chalmers, D. (2016b). “Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism”. En G. Bruntrup y L. Jaskola (eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, Oxford University Press, New York.
Chataignier, L., Hoehn, P., Lock, M., Mele, F. (2025). “Relational Dynamics with Periodic Clocks”. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.06479
Davidson, D. (1986). “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme”. En E. LePore (comp.), Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Blackwell, p. 194.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N. (1935). “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?”. Physical Review, 47: 777–780. https://archive.org/details/sim_physical-review_1935-05-15_47_10/page/n71
Esfeld, M., Gisin, N. (2014). “The GRW Flash Theory”. Philosophy of Science, pp. 248–264. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.5308
Fisher, M. (2015). Annals of Physics, 362: 593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2015.08.020
Fuchs, C. A. (2018). A Pesar de Bohr, las Razones del Qbism. arXiv:1705.03483. https://www.academia.edu/128092241/A_Pesar_de_Bohr_las_Razones_del_Qbism_Christopher_A_Fuchs
Favalli, T. (2025). “Relativistic Limits on the Discretization and Temporal Resolution of a Quantum Clock”. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05848
Gambini, R., Porto, R. (2001). Physical Review D, 63: 105014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.105014
Gambini, R., Lewowicz, L., Pullin, J. (2015). Foundations of Chemistry, 17: 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-015-9224-1
Gambini, R., Pullin, J. (2016). “Event Ontology in Quantum Mechanics and Downward Causation”. International Journal of Quantum Foundations, 2: 89.
Gambini, R., Pullin, J. (2018). “The Montevideo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”. Entropy, 20(6): 413.
Gambini, R., Pullin, J. (2020). “Fundamental Bound for Time Measurements and Minimum Uncertainty Clocks”. Journal of Physics Communications, 4(6): 065008. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08730
Gambini, R. (2023). Atoms and Persons. World Scientific, Singapore.
Gambini, R., Pullin, J. (2024). “Quantum Panprotopsychism and the Combination Problem”. Mind and Matter, 22(1): 51–94. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/mm
Gambini, R., Pullin, J. (2024). “Quantum Panprotopsychism and the Structure and Subject Summing Combination Problem”. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 32: 7–32. arXiv:2409.01368
Gambini, R., Pullin, J. (2025). “Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity in Quantum Panprotopsychism”. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11530
Gambini, R. (2025). “Quantum Panprotopsychism and a Consciousness Centered Universe”. arXiv:2508.04718
Gasaab, L., Pussuluk, O., Cattaneo, M., Ozgur, E. M. (2024). “Quantum Models of Consciousness from a Quantum Information Science Perspective”. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.03241v1
Genovese, M. “Research on Hidden Variable Theories: A Review of Recent Progresses”. Physics Reports, 413(6): 319–396. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=HayOPFAAAAAJ&citation_for_view=HayOPFAAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., Weber, T. (1986). “Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems”. Physical Review D, 34(2): 470–490.
Ghirardi, G. C., Grassi, R., Benatti, F. (1995). “Describing the Macroscopic World: Closing the Circle Within the Dynamical Reduction Program”. Foundations of Physics, 25: 5–38.
Gibson, E. J., Walk, R. D. (1960). Scientific American, 202: 64.
Ginsburg, S., Jablonka, E. (2019). The Evolution of the Sensitive Soul: Learning and the Origins of Consciousness. MIT Press, Boston, MA.
Goff, P., Seager, W., Allen-Hermanson, S. (2022). “Panpsychism”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/panpsychism/
Goldstein, S. (2025). “Bohmian Mechanics”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-bohm/#ObjeRespComm
Hall, M. (2010). “Local Deterministic Model of Singlet State Correlations Based on Relaxing Measurement Independence”. Physical Review Letters, 105(25): 250404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.250404
Healey, R. (1999). “Holism and Nonseparability in Physics”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu
Ikeya, N., Woodward, J. (2021). PNAS, 118(3).
James, W. (2017). The Principles of Psychology. Createspace, New York, NY. (Original work published 1890)
Kochen, S. (1985). “A New Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”. En P. Mittelstaedt y P. Lahti (eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1985. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 151–169.
Lombardi, O., Castagnino, M. (2008). “Una interpretación modal-hamiltoniana de la mecánica cuántica”. Estudios en Historia y Filosofía de la Física Moderna, 39: 380.
Lombardi, O., Dieks, D. (2021). “Interpretaciones modales de la mecánica cuántica”. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-modal
Maudlin, T. (2007). The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
McFadden, J., Al Khalili, J. (2016). Life on the Edge: The Coming Age of Quantum Biology. Crown, New York, NY.
Nagel, T. (1974). “What is it Like to Be a Bat?”. Philosophical Review, 4: 435–450.
Ng, Y., van Dam, H. (2003). Classical and Quantum Gravity, 20: 393. arXiv:gr-qc/0209021
Papineau, D. (2009). “The Rise of Physicalism”. En C. Gillett y B. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and Its Discontents, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Pusey, M., Barrett, J., Rudolph, T. (2012). “On the Reality of the Quantum State”. Nature Physics, 8: 475.
Rorty, R. (1994). Truth and Progress. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Rovelli, C. (1996). “Relational Quantum Mechanics”. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35: 1637–1678. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9609002
Russell, B. (2007). The Analysis of Matter. Spokesman Books, Nottingham, UK. (Original work published 1927)
Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., Wallace, D. (2010). Many Worlds?: Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Strawson, G. (2017). The Subject of Experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Tegmark, M. (2000). Physical Review E, 61: 4194.
Teller, P. (1986). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 37: 71.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1991). Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Van Fraassen, B. (2010). Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Vermaas, P. (1996). “Probabilidades de transición únicas en la interpretación modal”. Estudios en Historia y Filosofía de la Física Moderna, 27: 133.
Wallace, D. (2010). “Decoherence and Ontology (or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love FAPP)”. En Many Worlds?
Wallace, D. (2010). “How to Prove the Born Rule”. En Many Worlds?
Whitehead, A. N. (1933). Adventures of Ideas. The Free Press, London, UK.
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality. MacMillan, London, UK.
Wishon, D. (2017). “Panpsychism, Panprotopsychism, and Neutral Monism”. En B. McLaughlin (ed.), Philosophy: Mind. MacMillan Interdisciplinary Handbooks, Farmington Hills, MI.
Wittgenstein, L. (1972). On Certainty. Harper & Row, New York, NY.
Downloads
Submitted
2025-12-17Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rodolfo Gambini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
