Lógica y Física: Ontologías, Teorías y Datos Empíricos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35588/cc.v7d8358Palabras clave:
Lógicas cuánticas, monismo lógico, Problema de la Adopción, retículo de Hilbert, modelo de tres capasResumen
Las lógicas cuánticas estándar constituyen el único formalismo lógico no clásico extraído del interior de una teoría científica formulada con lógica clásica. Este rasgo motiva un modelo epistemológico de tres capas: L1 fija la ontología formal, L2 contiene las teorías y sus estructuras de eventos, y L3 comprende los datos empíricos. El modelo muestra que Putnam y Kripke comparten un mismo compromiso con el monismo lógico y permite sostener que la lógica es empírica en L2 y a priori en sentido funcional en L1.
Descargas
Referencias
Andréka, H., Madarász, J. X., y Németi, I. (1999). Logical analysis of special relativity theory. In Gerbrandy, J., Marx, M., de Rijke, M., y Venema, Y., editors, JFAK. Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday, Vossiuspers. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam. CD-ROM, ISBN 90 5629 104 1.
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., y Roger, G. (1982). Experimental test of bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 49(25):1804–1807.
Baltag, A. y Smets, S. (2006). Lqp: The dynamic logic of quantum information. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 16(3):491–525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129506005299.
Baltag, A. y Smets, S. (2008). Probabilistic dynamic belief revision. Synthese, 165(2):179–202.
Baltag, A. y Smets, S. (2011). Quantum logic as a dynamic logic. Synthese, 179(2):285–306.
Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U., y Sneed, J. D. (1987). An architectonic for science: The structuralist program. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Bell, J. L. y Hallett, M. F. (1982). Logic, quantum logic and empiricism. Philosophy of Science, 49(3):355–379.
Bell, J. S. (1964). On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox. Physics, 1(3):195–200.
Birkhoff, G. y Von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, 37(4):823–843.
Birman, R. (2024). The adoption problem and the epistemology of logic. Mind, 133:37–60.
Boghossian, P. y Wright, C. (2024). Kripke, quine, the ‘adoption problem’ and the empirical conception of logic. Mind, 133(529):86–116.
Carnap, R. (1934). Logische Syntax der Sprache. Springer, Vienna. English translation: The Logical Syntax of Language, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1937.
Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie. Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, 1956.
Cassirer, E. (1956). Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Cattaneo, G., Dalla Chiara, M. L., y Giuntini, R. (1993). Fuzzy intuitionistic quantum logics. Studia Logica, 52:419–442.
Cuesta, J. A. F. (2025). Suárez’s paradox and contemporary debates in the philosophy of quantum logics. Análisis. Revista de Investigación Filosófica, 12(1):93–105.
Cuesta, J. A. F. (2026). The question of quantum logics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-026-09780-w.
Cuesta, J. A. F. y Jorge, J. P. (2026). Beyond quantum individuals: Quasi-sets and the philosophy of quantum logics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 65:107.
Da Costa, N. C. A. y Krause, D. (1994). Schrödinger logics. Studia Logica, 53:533–550.
Dalla Chiara, M. L. y Giuntini, R. (2002). Quantum logics. In Gabbay, D. M. y Guenthner, F., editors, Handbook of philosophical logic, pages 129–228. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Dummett, M. (1976). Is logic empirical? In Lewis, H. D., editor, Contemporary British Philosophy, 4th Series, pages 45–68. Allen and Unwin, London, U.K. Reprinted in Truth and Other Enigmas, London: Duckworth, 1978, pp. 269–289.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., y Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47(10):777–780.
Fernández Cuesta, J., Piazzai, M., y Rivieccio, U. (2025). Quantum logics in cognition: A proposal. Synthese, 206:25.
Février, P. (1937). Les relations d’incertitude de heisenberg et la logique. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 204:481–483.
Finkelstein, D. (1969). Matter, space and logic. In Cohen, R. S. y Wartofsky, M. W., editors, Proceedings of the Boston colloquium for the philosophy of science 1966/1968, volume 5 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, pages 199–215. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Finn, S. (2019). The adoption problem and anti-exceptionalism about logic. The Australasian Journal of Logic, 16(7).
Frápolli, M. J. (2023). The Priority of Propositions. A Pragmatist Philosophy of Logic. Springer Verlag, Cham.
Gibbins, P. (1987). Particles and Paradoxes: The Limits of Quantum Logic. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Goldblatt, R. (1993). Mathematics of Modality. Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications, Stanford, CA.
Griffiths, D. J. y Schroeter, D. F. (2018). Introduction to quantum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and NY.
Hardegree, G. M. (1974). The conditional in quantum logic. Synthese, 29(1–4):63–80.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Empiricist criteria of cognitive significance: Problems and changes. In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, pages 101–122. Free Press, New York.
Hermann, G. (1936). Zum vortrag schlicks “quantentheorie und erkennbarkeit der natur”. Naturwissenschaften, 24(15):237–238.
Holik, F., Jorge, J. P., Krause, D., y Lombardi, O. (2022). Quasi-set theory: a formal approach to a quantum ontology of properties. Synthese, 200(401).
Horvat, S. y Toader, I. D. (2024). An alleged tension between non-classical logics and applied classical mathematics. The Philosophical Quarterly, 75(2):579–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqad125.
Kant, I. (1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, Riga. Segunda edición (B). Primera edición 1781.
Kripke, S. A. (2024). The question of logic. Mind, 133(529):1–36.
Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., Ardenghi, J. S., y Castagnino, M. (2011). Introduction to the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics. Nova Science Publishers, New York.
Lombardi, O., Pasqualini, M., Jorge, J. P., y Cuesta, J. A. F. (2026). Towards a logic of modalities for quantum mechanics. Logique et Analyse, forthcoming.
Padró [Birman], R. y Barrio, E. (2022). El problema de la adopción de reglas lógicas [The problem of adopting logical rules]. Análisis Filosófico, 41(1):33–42.
Popper, K. R. (1968). Birkhoff and von neumann’s interpretation of quantum mechanics. Nature, 219:682.
Putnam, H. (1969). Is logic empirical? In Cohen, R. S. y Wartofsky, M. W., editors, Proceedings of the Boston colloquium for the philosophy of science 1966/1968, volume 5 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, pages 216–241. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Republished as “The logic of quantum mechanics” in H. Putnam. (1969). Philosophical Papers I: Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1974). How to think quantum-logically. Synthese, 29(1–4):55–61.
Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60(1):20–43.
Reichenbach, H. (1944). Philosophic foundations of quantum mechanics. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Russell, B. (2009). The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell. Routledge, London and New York.
Russell, B. A. W. (1918). The philosophy of logical atomism. In Marsh, R. C., editor, Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, pages 177–281. Macmillan, London, U.K. Originally published in The Monist 28–29 (1918–1919).
Russell, B. A. W. (1924). Logical atomism. In Marsh, R. C., editor, Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, pages 323–343. Macmillan, London, U.K. Originally published in J. H. Muirhead (ed.), Contemporary British Philosophy, London, 1924, 356–383.
Schlick, M. (1936). Quantentheorie und erkennbarkeit der natur. Naturwissenschaften, 24(12):161–166.
Smets, S. (2001). On causation and a counterfactual in quantum logic: The Sasaki hook. Logique et Analyse, 44(173–175):307–325.
Suárez, M. (2024). Inference and Representation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Suárez, M. (2025). The logic of quantum theory revisited. Análisis. Revista de Investigación Filosófica, 12(1):47–92.
Svozil, K. (1998). Quantum logic. Springer, Singapore.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1974). The labyrinth of quantum logics. In Cohen, R. S. y Wartofsky, M. W., editors, Logical and Epistemological Studies in Contemporary Physics, volume 13 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pages 161–187. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Williamson, T. (2018). Alternative logics and applied mathematics. Philosophical Issues, 28(1):399–424.
Wilson, A. (2020). The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922 [1921]). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge and Kegan Paul LTD, London, U.K.
Zawirski, Z. (1931). Jan Łukasiewicz’s three-valued logic [logika trójwartościowa jana Łukasiewicza]. Sprawozdania Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk, 2-4:35–37. Original publication in Polish.
Descargas
Enviado
2026-10-31Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 J.A.F. Cuesta
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
