O ODS 13 como contêiner discursivo: futuros climáticos tecnocráticos e relacionais na Indonésia e no Equador na COP21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35588/ayr.v8i1.8074Palavras-chave:
discurso climático, ODS 13, tecnocracia, ecologia relacional, trópicos, COP21, Acordo de ParisResumo
A governança das mudanças climáticas está cada vez mais estruturada por meio de marcos globais, como os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS) das Nações Unidas, particularmente o ODS 13 (Ação Climática), que padronizam a ação climática por meio de metas e indicadores, ao mesmo tempo em que permitem variações discursivas na forma como os futuros climáticos são imaginados. Este artigo examina a construção discursiva dos futuros climáticos na comunicação climática de Estados tropicais, comparando as declarações nacionais proferidas pelos chefes de Estado na Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre Mudanças Climáticas de 2015 (COP21), a cúpula que culminou no Acordo de Paris. Utilizando a análise comparativa qualitativa do discurso (Witajewska-Baltvilka et al., 2024), o estudo analisa os discursos dos presidentes da Indonésia e do Equador e apresenta duas heurísticas analíticas — linguagem climática tecnocrática e linguagem climática ecológica relacional — desenvolvidas neste estudo para distinguir modos contrastantes de discurso climático. Os resultados mostram que o discurso da Indonésia na COP21 enquadra predominantemente os futuros climáticos por meio de uma linguagem tecnocrática que enfatiza a capacidade de governança e a implementação de políticas, enquanto o discurso do Equador articula futuros ecológicos relacionais fundamentados na responsabilidade moral e na justiça intergeracional. O artigo argumenta que o ODS 13 funciona como um recipiente discursivo cuja forma institucional posterior cristalizou os imaginários climáticos articulados na COP21, demonstrando que os futuros climáticos são ativamente produzidos por meio da linguagem.
Downloads
Referências
Akhtar, M. J., Rehman, H. U., & Abbas, Q. (2024). “The promissory note at COP-21 of sustainable energy for all” Is it converging toward economic development? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(10), 26557–26578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03743-7
Anta-Félez, J. L., Pérez-García, R. G., & Sánchez-Miranda, M. D. C. (2024). Policies and practices of social intervention in the contemporary context. Revisiting Ulrich Beck’s theory and the risk society. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 9. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-695
Bayraktar, A., Kleftodimos, G., Kyrgiakos, L. S., Kleisiari, C., Vlontzos, G., & Belhouchette, H. (2024). Assessing climate change awareness among Mediterranean university students: a comparative study of french and greek universities. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14(4), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00946-w
Beck, U., & Ritter, M. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.
Caradaică, M. (2024). European climate pact ambassadors as new organic intellectuals: Neo-Gramscian analysis of EU climate hegemony and just transition. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 24(2), 131–143. https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/RJEA_vol.24_no.2_Dec-2024-Art-7.pdf
Cirne, A. O., & Efken, K. H. (2023). Norman Fairclough beyond the three-dimensional model perspective tridimensional. Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade, 24(2), 30–43.https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v24i2.44190
Craciun, M. A., Chita, E. I., Eremia, M., Panait, M., & Dumitrescu-Popa, S. (2024). The behavioral economics of climate change: Nudging toward net zero. International Journal of Sustainability in Economic, Social, and Cultural Context, 20(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1115/CGP/v20i02/77-94
Darnell, S. C. (2025). Ontology, design and the multiple lifeworlds of sport for development and peace. In Sustainable Development Goals Series (pp. 21–39). Springer
de Haas, W., & Westerink, J. (2026). Landscape governance as a matter of concern: A relational framework. Ambio, 55(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02226-5
de Kleyn, L., Coffey, B., & Bush, J. (2025). Opportunities for more ecologically centred and equitable relations in local government environmental discourse: insights from Victoria, Australia. Local Environment, 30(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2428223
Dryzek, J. S. (1995). Political and ecological communication. Environmental Politics, 4(4), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019508414226
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The Making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Escobar, A. (2022). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Design and Culture. 11(3), 355–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1664496
Ferreira-Neto, J. L. (2018). Michel Foucault and qualitative research in human and social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3070
Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Today's tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86
Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language. Stanford University Press
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Parmisana, V. R. (2024). Environmental e-corporate social responsibility in southern Philippines’ manufacturing industries. Journal of Asian Linguistic Anthropology, 5(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.47298/jala.v5-i4-a1
Penz, H., & Fill, A. (2022). Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of World Languages, 8(2), 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0008
Poddar, A. K. (2024). Climate change and global policy: Traversing the new model of environmental globalization. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies, 19(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-755X/CGP/v19i02/125-145
Poorghorban, Y. (2023). On Michel Foucault: Power/knowledge, discourse, and subjectivity. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v17i2.9749
President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015, November 30). Statement at the Leaders’ Event, COP21 / CMP11 [Paris Climate Change Conference]. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
President of the Republic of Ecuador. (2015, November 30). Statement at the Leaders’ Event, COP21 / CMP11 [Paris Climate Change Conference]. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Rhouma, A., Autino, A., Montagnino, F. M., Malagó, A., Dallera, D., Bidoglio, G., & Maria, G. J. (2025). A novel tool for translating Research and Innovation project outputs into measurable contributions to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Science and Policy, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104284
Sadiq, M., Fadel, M. E., Mezher, T., & Mayyas, A. (2025). Interconnectedness of economic growth and environmental sustainability: challenges and strategies. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-025-00543-x
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Velazquez, L. (2025). Battery electric vehicles as a strategy for local governments in progressing toward SDG 11 and SDG 13. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01509-x
Witajewska-Baltvilka, B., Helepciuc, F.-E., Mangalagiu, D., & Todor, A. (2024). Politicization of climate change and Central and Eastern European countries’ stance towards the European Green Deal. Global Environmental Change, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102932
Wodak, R. (2024). Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the face of global uncertainty: An interdisciplinary discourse-historical approach. Informal Logic, 44(3), 361–398. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v44i3.8927
Wuebben, D., Wang, E., Domingo, E. G., & Romero-Luis, J. (2024). Diverging paths, converging goals: Framing crisis to kairos in Bill Gates’s and Greta Thunberg’s climate discourse. Energy Research and Social Science, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103747
Xie, X., Dai, W., & Li, Z. (2025). Investigating the relationship between climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: the Asia-Pacific region’s path towards SFDRR targets. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 17(1), 1054–1076. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2024-0202
Downloads
Submetido
2026-04-05Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Prapti Wigati Purwaningrum, Haryo Sutanto
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
