SDG 13 as Discursive Container: Technocratic and Relational Climate Futures in Indonesia and Ecuador at COP21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35588/ayr.v8i1.8074Keywords:
climate discourse, SDG 13, technocracy, relational ecology, tropics, COP21, Paris AgreementAbstract
Climate change governance is increasingly structured through global frameworks such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 13 (Climate Action), which standardize climate action through targets and indicators while allowing discursive variation in how climate futures are imagined. This article examines the discursive construction of climate futures in tropical state climate communication by comparing head-of-state national statements delivered at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21), the summit that culminated in the Paris Agreement. Using qualitative comparative discourse analysis (Witajewska-Baltvilka et al., 2024), the study analyzes speeches by the Presidents of Indonesia and Ecuador and introduces two analytical heuristics—technocratic climate language and relational ecological climate language— developed in this study to distinguish contrasting modes of climate discourse. The findings show that Indonesia’s COP21 speech predominantly frames climate futures through technocratic language emphasizing governance capacity and policy implementation, while Ecuador’s speech articulates relational ecological futures grounded in moral responsibility and intergenerational justice. The article argues that SDG 13 functions as a discursive container whose later institutional form crystallized climate imaginaries articulated at COP21, demonstrating that climate futures are actively produced through language.
Downloads
References
Akhtar, M. J., Rehman, H. U., & Abbas, Q. (2024). “The promissory note at COP-21 of sustainable energy for all” Is it converging toward economic development? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(10), 26557–26578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03743-7
Anta-Félez, J. L., Pérez-García, R. G., & Sánchez-Miranda, M. D. C. (2024). Policies and practices of social intervention in the contemporary context. Revisiting Ulrich Beck’s theory and the risk society. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 9. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-695
Bayraktar, A., Kleftodimos, G., Kyrgiakos, L. S., Kleisiari, C., Vlontzos, G., & Belhouchette, H. (2024). Assessing climate change awareness among Mediterranean university students: a comparative study of french and greek universities. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14(4), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00946-w
Beck, U., & Ritter, M. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.
Caradaică, M. (2024). European climate pact ambassadors as new organic intellectuals: Neo-Gramscian analysis of EU climate hegemony and just transition. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 24(2), 131–143. https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/RJEA_vol.24_no.2_Dec-2024-Art-7.pdf
Cirne, A. O., & Efken, K. H. (2023). Norman Fairclough beyond the three-dimensional model perspective tridimensional. Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade, 24(2), 30–43.https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v24i2.44190
Craciun, M. A., Chita, E. I., Eremia, M., Panait, M., & Dumitrescu-Popa, S. (2024). The behavioral economics of climate change: Nudging toward net zero. International Journal of Sustainability in Economic, Social, and Cultural Context, 20(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1115/CGP/v20i02/77-94
Darnell, S. C. (2025). Ontology, design and the multiple lifeworlds of sport for development and peace. In Sustainable Development Goals Series (pp. 21–39). Springer
de Haas, W., & Westerink, J. (2026). Landscape governance as a matter of concern: A relational framework. Ambio, 55(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02226-5
de Kleyn, L., Coffey, B., & Bush, J. (2025). Opportunities for more ecologically centred and equitable relations in local government environmental discourse: insights from Victoria, Australia. Local Environment, 30(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2428223
Dryzek, J. S. (1995). Political and ecological communication. Environmental Politics, 4(4), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019508414226
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The Making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Escobar, A. (2022). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Design and Culture. 11(3), 355–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1664496
Ferreira-Neto, J. L. (2018). Michel Foucault and qualitative research in human and social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3070
Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Today's tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86
Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language. Stanford University Press
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Parmisana, V. R. (2024). Environmental e-corporate social responsibility in southern Philippines’ manufacturing industries. Journal of Asian Linguistic Anthropology, 5(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.47298/jala.v5-i4-a1
Penz, H., & Fill, A. (2022). Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of World Languages, 8(2), 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0008
Poddar, A. K. (2024). Climate change and global policy: Traversing the new model of environmental globalization. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies, 19(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-755X/CGP/v19i02/125-145
Poorghorban, Y. (2023). On Michel Foucault: Power/knowledge, discourse, and subjectivity. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v17i2.9749
President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015, November 30). Statement at the Leaders’ Event, COP21 / CMP11 [Paris Climate Change Conference]. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
President of the Republic of Ecuador. (2015, November 30). Statement at the Leaders’ Event, COP21 / CMP11 [Paris Climate Change Conference]. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Rhouma, A., Autino, A., Montagnino, F. M., Malagó, A., Dallera, D., Bidoglio, G., & Maria, G. J. (2025). A novel tool for translating Research and Innovation project outputs into measurable contributions to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Science and Policy, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104284
Sadiq, M., Fadel, M. E., Mezher, T., & Mayyas, A. (2025). Interconnectedness of economic growth and environmental sustainability: challenges and strategies. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-025-00543-x
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Velazquez, L. (2025). Battery electric vehicles as a strategy for local governments in progressing toward SDG 11 and SDG 13. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01509-x
Witajewska-Baltvilka, B., Helepciuc, F.-E., Mangalagiu, D., & Todor, A. (2024). Politicization of climate change and Central and Eastern European countries’ stance towards the European Green Deal. Global Environmental Change, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102932
Wodak, R. (2024). Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the face of global uncertainty: An interdisciplinary discourse-historical approach. Informal Logic, 44(3), 361–398. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v44i3.8927
Wuebben, D., Wang, E., Domingo, E. G., & Romero-Luis, J. (2024). Diverging paths, converging goals: Framing crisis to kairos in Bill Gates’s and Greta Thunberg’s climate discourse. Energy Research and Social Science, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103747
Xie, X., Dai, W., & Li, Z. (2025). Investigating the relationship between climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: the Asia-Pacific region’s path towards SFDRR targets. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 17(1), 1054–1076. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2024-0202
Downloads
Submitted
2026-04-05Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prapti Wigati Purwaningrum, Haryo Sutanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







