El ODS 13 como contenedor discursivo: futuros climáticos tecnocráticos y relacionales en Indonesia y Ecuador en la COP21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35588/ayr.v8i1.8074Palabras clave:
discurso climático, ODS 13, tecnocracia, ecología relacional, trópicos, COP21, Acuerdo de ParísResumen
Este estudio analiza la arquitectura de la gobernanza climática global, centrada en el Objetivo de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) 13 de Acción por el Clima de las Naciones Unidas, como un marco que normaliza la acción institucional mediante metas e indicadores, permitiendo simultáneamente diversas trayectorias discursivas. A través de un análisis comparativo cualitativo (Witajewska-Baltvilka et al., 2024) de las declaraciones en la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático de 2015, COP21, la investigación examina la construcción de futuros climáticos en los estados tropicales de Indonesia y Ecuador. Para ello, se proponen dos heurísticas analíticas: el lenguaje tecnocrático y el lenguaje ecológico relacional. Los hallazgos demuestran que, mientras Indonesia articula una visión tecnocrática enfocada en la implementación de políticas y capacidad estatal, Ecuador fundamenta su discurso en la justicia intergeneracional y la responsabilidad moral bajo una lógica ecológica relacional. En conclusión, el artículo conceptualiza el ODS 13 como un contenedor discursivo que cristaliza los imaginarios climáticos de COP21. El estudio subraya que los futuros climáticos no son entes dados, sino producciones performativas generadas mediante el discurso político en espacios multilaterales.
Descargas
Referencias
Akhtar, M. J., Rehman, H. U., & Abbas, Q. (2024). “The promissory note at COP-21 of sustainable energy for all” Is it converging toward economic development? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(10), 26557–26578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03743-7
Anta-Félez, J. L., Pérez-García, R. G., & Sánchez-Miranda, M. D. C. (2024). Policies and practices of social intervention in the contemporary context. Revisiting Ulrich Beck’s theory and the risk society. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 9. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-695
Bayraktar, A., Kleftodimos, G., Kyrgiakos, L. S., Kleisiari, C., Vlontzos, G., & Belhouchette, H. (2024). Assessing climate change awareness among Mediterranean university students: a comparative study of french and greek universities. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14(4), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00946-w
Beck, U., & Ritter, M. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.
Caradaică, M. (2024). European climate pact ambassadors as new organic intellectuals: Neo-Gramscian analysis of EU climate hegemony and just transition. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 24(2), 131–143. https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/RJEA_vol.24_no.2_Dec-2024-Art-7.pdf
Cirne, A. O., & Efken, K. H. (2023). Norman Fairclough beyond the three-dimensional model perspective tridimensional. Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade, 24(2), 30–43.https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v24i2.44190
Craciun, M. A., Chita, E. I., Eremia, M., Panait, M., & Dumitrescu-Popa, S. (2024). The behavioral economics of climate change: Nudging toward net zero. International Journal of Sustainability in Economic, Social, and Cultural Context, 20(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1115/CGP/v20i02/77-94
Darnell, S. C. (2025). Ontology, design and the multiple lifeworlds of sport for development and peace. In Sustainable Development Goals Series (pp. 21–39). Springer
de Haas, W., & Westerink, J. (2026). Landscape governance as a matter of concern: A relational framework. Ambio, 55(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02226-5
de Kleyn, L., Coffey, B., & Bush, J. (2025). Opportunities for more ecologically centred and equitable relations in local government environmental discourse: insights from Victoria, Australia. Local Environment, 30(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2428223
Dryzek, J. S. (1995). Political and ecological communication. Environmental Politics, 4(4), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019508414226
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The Making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Escobar, A. (2022). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Design and Culture. 11(3), 355–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1664496
Ferreira-Neto, J. L. (2018). Michel Foucault and qualitative research in human and social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3070
Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Today's tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86
Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language. Stanford University Press
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Parmisana, V. R. (2024). Environmental e-corporate social responsibility in southern Philippines’ manufacturing industries. Journal of Asian Linguistic Anthropology, 5(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.47298/jala.v5-i4-a1
Penz, H., & Fill, A. (2022). Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of World Languages, 8(2), 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0008
Poddar, A. K. (2024). Climate change and global policy: Traversing the new model of environmental globalization. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies, 19(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-755X/CGP/v19i02/125-145
Poorghorban, Y. (2023). On Michel Foucault: Power/knowledge, discourse, and subjectivity. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v17i2.9749
President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015, November 30). Statement at the Leaders’ Event, COP21 / CMP11 [Paris Climate Change Conference]. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
President of the Republic of Ecuador. (2015, November 30). Statement at the Leaders’ Event, COP21 / CMP11 [Paris Climate Change Conference]. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Rhouma, A., Autino, A., Montagnino, F. M., Malagó, A., Dallera, D., Bidoglio, G., & Maria, G. J. (2025). A novel tool for translating Research and Innovation project outputs into measurable contributions to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Science and Policy, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104284
Sadiq, M., Fadel, M. E., Mezher, T., & Mayyas, A. (2025). Interconnectedness of economic growth and environmental sustainability: challenges and strategies. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-025-00543-x
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Velazquez, L. (2025). Battery electric vehicles as a strategy for local governments in progressing toward SDG 11 and SDG 13. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01509-x
Witajewska-Baltvilka, B., Helepciuc, F.-E., Mangalagiu, D., & Todor, A. (2024). Politicization of climate change and Central and Eastern European countries’ stance towards the European Green Deal. Global Environmental Change, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102932
Wodak, R. (2024). Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the face of global uncertainty: An interdisciplinary discourse-historical approach. Informal Logic, 44(3), 361–398. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v44i3.8927
Wuebben, D., Wang, E., Domingo, E. G., & Romero-Luis, J. (2024). Diverging paths, converging goals: Framing crisis to kairos in Bill Gates’s and Greta Thunberg’s climate discourse. Energy Research and Social Science, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103747
Xie, X., Dai, W., & Li, Z. (2025). Investigating the relationship between climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: the Asia-Pacific region’s path towards SFDRR targets. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 17(1), 1054–1076. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2024-0202
Descargas
Enviado
2026-04-05Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Prapti Wigati Purwaningrum, Haryo Sutanto
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
