Evaluation format

Does the article have a title coherent with its content? Yes-No

Is the title clear and concise; does it avoid flashy expressions? Yes-No

Does the article have an abstract? Yes-No

Does the abstract summarize the essential points of the article? Yes-No

Does it contain at least four keywords? Yes-No

Are the keywords appropriate to the content of the article? Yes-No

Is the title translated into English or another language? Yes-No

Is the translation of the title correct? Yes-No

Are the keywords translated (key words)? Yes-No

Is there a translation of the abstract (abstract)? Yes-No

Is the translation of keywords and abstract correct? Yes-No

Does the article refer to any institutional or personal research context, sources of funding? Yes-No

Does the work present a clear problematization to be addressed (topic, thesis, hypothesis, methodology)? Justify.

Does the work present the state of the art or state of the question through an adequate bibliographic discussion? Justify.

Does the theoretical framework allow the construction of a consistent and coherent academic argument? Justify.

Are spelling errors detected? Indicate the page(s) and line(s) where they are found.

Lexical correctness.

Is an appropriate lexicon detected for each concept, avoiding vagueness, improprieties or vulgarisms? Justify.

Syntactic correctness.

Is there an appropriate construction of sentences and paragraphs? Is there a clear unity of meaning between paragraphs? Justify.

Cohesion and unity of the text.

(Clarification: All elements of the text must be subordinated to the same purpose. This translates into the existence of a main trunk or backbone from which different branches linked to it emerge, allowing the support of an academic argument. Therefore, the selection of content must be relevant to fulfill that objective.) Yes/No. Justify.

Correctness and richness of citations and bibliographic references.

(Clarification: Citations must provide additional content to the information offered in the central body of the text, while bibliographic references must specify where certain information is extracted from. The quality and relevance of both must be assessed.) Yes/No. Justify.

Relevance and variety in the selection of sources, cases and examples.

(Clarification: Any academic writing must demonstrate the quality of the sources and examples on which the expository and explanatory part of the work is based.) Yes/No. Justify.

Soundness of argumentation and conclusions.

(Clarification: This criterion basically addresses the consistency and coherence of the text: are the author's statements supported?) Yes/No. Justify.

Relevance of the topic.

Is the topic addressed novel; does it contribute to what is known so far? Yes/No. Justify.

Approach and method.

Does the topic worked incorporate novelties in the way it was done? Does it promote new perspectives, contribute unknown sources, interact with other disciplines, etc.? Yes/No. Justify.

Perspectives and openings.

(Clarification: as the academic text aims to answer a limited number of questions, does the work suggest or propose new questions and approaches to consider?) Yes/No. Justify.

FINAL DECISION: Accepted / Accepted with minor corrections / Do not publish / FINAL COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: