Appraisal of academic and research staff by amplification of scores according to their proximity to institutional objectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35588/mfpwd493

Keywords:

performance appraisal, academic and research staff, Manhattan distance, similarity metrics, time series

Abstract

The issue of tension between the individual objectives of academic and research staff and the strategic objectives of the institution in which they work is addressed in this study, to develop a methodology for their appraisal that takes into account both individual objectives, in the context of academic freedom, and the above-mentioned institutional strategic objectives. To this end, a similarity metric is proposed, based on the Manhattan distance, to measure the proximity between individual and institutional objectives, which allows generating an amplification factor for individual scores. The new amplified score can be used to generate work incentives, such as job promotions or financial benefits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Julio Sergio Santana Sepúlveda, Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua

    PhD., Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua. Jiutepec, México.

References

Aubrey, K. (2018). Generalizing and Transferring Mathematical Definitions from Euclidean to Taxicab Geometry. (Tesis doctoral, College of Arts; Sciences at Georgia State University). https://doi.org/10.57709/12521263

Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Freeman, J. R., Hitt, M. P. y Pevehouse, J. C. (2014). Time series analysis for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/9780521691550

Columbia University. (2005). Statement on Academic Freedom. First Global Colloquium of University Presidents.

Cuesta-Santos, A. (2021). Tecnologı́a de gestión de recursos humanos. CITMATEL.

Deem, R. (1998). ‘New managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International studies in sociology of education, 8(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021980020014

Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative education, 37(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060020020408

Egginton, B. (2010). Introduction of Formal Performance Appraisal of Academic Staff. Educational Management Administration y Leadership, 38, 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209351660

Getzels, J. W., y Guba, E. G. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process. The school review, 65(4), 423-441.

Gorbaneff, Y., Torres, S. y Cardona, J. F. (2009). El concepto de incentivo en administración. Una revisión de la literatura. Revista de Economı́a Institucional, 11(21), 73-91.

Hoy, W. K. y Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Kljun, M., Teršek, M. y Štrumbelj, E. (2020, septiembre). A review and comparison of time series similarity measures. https://erk.fe.uni-lj.si/2020/papers/kljun(a_review).pdf

Lhermitte, S., Verbesselt, J., Verstraeten, W. W. y Coppin, P. (2011). A comparison of time series similarity measures for classification and change detection of ecosystem dynamics. Remote sensing of environment, 115(12), 3129-3152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.020

Marquina, M. M., Perez Centeno, C. G. y Reznik, N. (2021). Institutional influence of academics in Argentinean public universities in a context of external control. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 46(4), 54-72. https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2021.46.4

Presidencia de la República. (2001, octubre). DECRETO por el que se crea el Instituto Mexicano de Tecnologı́a del Agua. Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=760175&fecha=30/10/2001#gsc.tab=0

Santana-Sepúlveda, J. S. y Quevedo-Tiznado, J. A. (2024). Procedimiento para la Evaluación de Tecnólogos del Agua del Instituto Mexicano de Tecnologı́a del Agua. Instituto Mexicano de Tecnologı́a del Agua. https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19499.25124/2

Shin, Y. (2017). Time series analysis in the social sciences: the fundamentals. Univ of California Press.

Thomson, R. E. y Emery, W. J. (2014). Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanography (3rd ed.). Elsevier Science. https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=59fEAgAAQBAJ

Van den Brink, M., Fruytier, B. y Thunnissen, M. (2013). Talent management in academia: Performance systems and HRM policies. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(2), 180-195.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

Issue

Section

People Management

How to Cite

Appraisal of academic and research staff by amplification of scores according to their proximity to institutional objectives. (2025). People and Technology Management Journal, 18(53), 102-132. https://doi.org/10.35588/mfpwd493