Biological Individuality in Scientific Practice

Individuation Criteria and Epistemic Goals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35588/cc.v2i1.4880

Keywords:

Biological Individual, Plurality, Pluralism, Monismo

Abstract

Biology uses multiple criteria to individuate biological phenomena. Monistic approaches propose that we should arbitrate between that diversity and define unique criteria of individuality, that is, unique ways of counting individuals in biology. Pluralism, on the other hand, argues that we should not restrict the study of individuality to unique conceptions, recognizing different types of individuals. In this article I will analyze how some monistic and pluralistic approaches face the plurality of individuation criteria used by scientific practice. Following the recent epistemological and pragmatic approaches in the philosophy of biological individuality, I will argue why the diversity of individuations is usually not a problem for biology and why it contributes to our knowledge of the biological world. The general conclusion will be that we require multiple ways to individuate nature in order to fulfill the various epistemic goals of biology, a task that monistic approaches do not usually make visible. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bonner, J. T. (2000). First signals. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmjp

Bouchard, F. y Huneman, P. (2013). From groups to individuals: evolution and emerging individuality. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmjq

Brasier, C. (1992). “A champion thallus”. Nature, 356(6368): 382-383. doi: https://doi.org/bxxn77

Buss, L. W. (1987). The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmjr

Chang, H. (2012). Is water H2O? Evidence, realism and pluralism. Berlín: Springer Science & Business Media. doi: https://doi.org/gmjs

Clarke, E. (2010). “The Problem of Biological Individuality”. Biological Theory, 5(4): 312-325. doi: https://doi.org/fjjcmq

Clarke, E. (2013). “The Multiple Realizability of Biological Individuals”. Journal of Philosophy, 110(8): 413-435. doi: https://doi.org/f3gbgx

Clarke, E. y Okasha, S. (2013). “Species and organisms: what are the problems”. En: F. Bouchard y P. Huneman (eds.), From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmjt

Douglas, A. E. y Werren, J. H. (2016). “Holes in the Hologenome: Why Host-Microbe Symbioses Are Not Holobionts”. mBio, 7(2): e02099-02015. doi: https://doi.org/f9kt9n

Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

Dupré, J. (2012). Processes of life: Essays in the philosophy of biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmjv

Fagan, M. B. (2015). “Cell and Body: Individuals in Stem Cell Biology”. En: A. Guay y T. Pradeu (eds.), Individuals Across the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmjx

Ghiselin, M.T. (1974). “A radical solution to the species problem”. Systematic Zoology, 23(4): 536-544. doi: https://doi.org/gmjz

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2013). “Darwinian individuals”. En: F. Bouchard y P. Huneman (ed), From groups to individuals: evolution and emerging individuality. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmj2

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2014). Philosophy of biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmj5

Hölldobler, B. y Wilson, E. O. (2009). The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Hull, D.L. (1976). “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology, 25(2): 174-191. doi: https://doi.org/cfr6h6

Hull, D.L. (1978). “A Matter of Individuality”. Philosophy of Science, 45(3): 335-360. doi: https://doi.org/c8td8g

Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. E. y Waters, C. K. (2006). Scientific pluralism. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Kovaka, K. (2015). “Biological individuality and scientific practice”. Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 1092-1103. doi: https://doi.org/ggwvbn

Krakauer, D., Bertschinger, N., Olbrich, E., Jessica C.F. y Nihat, A. (2020). "The Information Theory of Individuality." Theory in Biosciences, 139(2): 209-23. doi: https://doi.org/ggrqm2

Kwong, W. K., Medina, L. A., Koch, H., Sing, K.-W., Soh, E. J. Y., Ascher, J. S., Jaffé, R. y Moran, N. A. (2017). “Dynamic microbiome evolution in social bees”. Science Advances, 3(3): e1600513. doi: https://doi.org/gmkb

Lidgard, S. y Nyhart, L. K. (2017). “The Work of Biological Individuality: Concepts and Contexts”. En: S. Lidgard y L.K. Nyhart (ed), Biological Individuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmkc

Love, A. C. (2018). “Individuation, Individuality, and Experimental Practice in Developmental Biology”. En: O. Bueno, R. L. Chen y M.B. Fagan (ed), Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmkd

Love, A. C. y Brigandt, I. (2017). “Philosophical Dimensions of Individuality”. En: S. Lidgard y L.K. Nyhart (ed), Biological Individuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmkg

Lovelock, J. E. y Margulis, L. (1974). “Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the gaia hypothesis”. Tellus, 26(1‐2): 2-10. doi: https://doi.org/fzrv4d

Lovelock, J. E. (1979). Gaia. A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mitchell, S. D. (2003). Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmkh

Mitchell, S. D. (2009). Unsimple truths: Science, complexity, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmkj

Molter, D. (2017). “On Mushroom Individuality”. Philosophy of Science, 84(5): 1117-1127. doi: https://doi.org/gmkm

Molter, D. J. (2019). “On mycorrhizal individuality”. Biology and Philosophy, 34(5): 1-16. doi: https://doi.org/gmkn

Moritz, R. y Southwick, E. E. (1992). Bees as superorganisms: an evolutionary reality. Berlín: Springer Science & Business Media. doi: https://doi.org/cqtrpk

National Research Council Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and functional applications. (2007). The New Science of Metagenomics: Revealing the Secrets of Our Microbial Planet. USA, National Academies Press, National Academy of Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/gmkp

Niklas, K. J. y Newman, S.A. (2016). Multicellularity. Origins and Evolution. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.

Pepper, J. y Herron, M. (2008). “Does biology need an organism concept?”. Biol. Rev., 83: 621–627. doi: https://doi.org/cwwgf3

Pradeu, T. (2010). “What is An Organism? An Immunological Answer”. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2/3): 247-267.

Pradeu, T. (2016). “Organisms or biological individuals? Combining physiological and evolutionary individuality”. Biology & Philosophy, 31(6): 797-817. doi: https://doi.org/gf5kz8

Queller, D. C. y Strassmann, J. E. (2009). “Beyond society: the evolution of organismality”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1533): 3143-3155. doi: https://doi.org/bzccvb

Roughgarden, J., Gilbert, S. F., Rosenberg, E., Zilber-Rosenberg, I. y Lloyd, E. A. (2018). “Holobionts as Units of Selection and a Model of Their Population Dynamics and Evolution”. Biological Theory, 13(1): 44-65. doi: https://doi.org/gfz64c

Ruphy, S. (2017). Scientific pluralism reconsidered: A new approach to the (dis) unity of science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmkr

Shannon, Claude E. “A mathematical theory of communication”. The Bell system technical journal 27, 3 (1948): 379-423. doi: https://doi.org/b39t

Smith, J. M. y Szathmary, E. (1997). The major transitions in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, M. L., Bruhn, J. N. y Anderson, J. B. (1992). “The fungus Armillaria bulbosa is among the largest and oldest living organisms”. Nature, 356(6368): 428-431. doi: https://doi.org/bc3tfb

Strassmann, J. E. y Queller, D. C. (2010). “The Social Organism: Congresses, Parties, and Committees”. Evolution, 64(3): 605-616. doi: https://doi.org/dr3rws

Waters, C. K. (2007). “The Nature and Context of Exploratory Experimentation: An Introduction to Three Case Studies of Exploratory Research”. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 29(3): 275-284.

Waters, C. K. (2018). “Ask Not What Is an Individual?”. En: O. Bueno, R.L. Chen y M.B. Fagan (ed), Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/gmks

Wilson, D. S. y Sober, E. (1989). “Reviving the superorganism”. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 136(3): 337-356. doi: https://doi.org/c7r8d4

Wilson, E. O. (1971). The insect societies. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

Wilson, J. (1999). Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wilson, J. A. (2000). “Ontological Butchery: Organism Concepts and Biological Generalizations”. Philosophy of Science, 67: S301-S311. doi: https://doi.org/fsgk68

Downloads

Published

2021-07-31

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Miscellaneous

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Francisco Javier Navarro Cárdenas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Regarding the copyright of the contributions (i.e. articles or others) published or sent to Culturas Científicas, it will be understood that the authors accept the following terms at the time of submitting:  

  • The authors will retain the rights of the contributions they submit to Culturas Científicas.

  • The authors accept that their contribution is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) once it is published.

This means that the published contribution may be shared and adapted—even commercially—as long as proper credit is given and no endorsement by the author (i.e. licensor) is implied.

  • Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the time of accepting their contribution, the authors grant its first publication exclusively to Culturas Científicas.

  • Once the contribution is accepted, the authors grant to Culturas Científicas the rights of reproduction and distribution of their article in all countries of the world for their exploitation in any medium, format or support.

  • The authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the contribution published by our journal (e.g. deposit in archives, publication in other journals, book compendiums or translation) committing to indicate that the original publication was made in Culturas Científicas or publishing the version that already has the identifiers of our journal.

We encourage the authors to spread their articles through the internet in sites designated for it in order to motivate their reading and discussion.

How to Cite

Biological Individuality in Scientific Practice: Individuation Criteria and Epistemic Goals. (2021). Culturas Científicas, 2(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.35588/cc.v2i1.4880