The Affective-Psychic, the Dynamic, and the Complex. A (post) Critical Look
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35588/gpt.v14i42.5280Keywords:
interdisciplinary, technologies, humanities, Günther, Derrida, Sloterdijk, System DynamicsAbstract
In this article we will try to show that the great difference when it comes to assuming, designing, and responding from the systemic point of view is given by the incorporation or not of the affective psychic. That, in this sense, the approaches and responses regarding our complex and uncertain existence on the planet can be distinguished and differentiated; which, in this article, will be reduced to four: normative analytics; the complex differential; the speculative techno-soul; and the systemic dynamics. And the hypothesis of this work is that the last two not only bear similarities, but also seem to be the most suitable and fruitful to take on our challenges in this 21st century.
Downloads
References
Aaronson, S. (2011). “Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity”. Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp.1-58.
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity & Posmodernism. Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
Eyzaguirre, Sylvia. (2018). Sloterdijk y los impuestos. La Tercera, 3. Disponible en https://www.latercera.com/opinion/noticia/sloterdijk-los-impuestos/396656/
Gasché, R. (1995). Le Tain du Miroir. Derrida et la philosophie de la réflexion. Paris: Éditions Galilée.
Günther, G. (1976). BeitrÄge zur Grundlegung einer operationsfÄhigen Dialektik Dritter Band. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Heidegger, M. (1997). Ser y Tiempo. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Hidalgo, C. (2021). How Human Judge Machines. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Lane, D. C. (2007). The Power of the Bond Between Cause and Effect: Jay Wright Forrester and the Field of System Dynamics. Downloaded from http://systemdynamics.org/publications.htm
Mitcham, C. (1989). ¿Qué es la Filosofía de la Tecnología? Barcelona: Editorial Anthropos.
Mitchan, C. y Mackey, R. (2004). Filosofía de la Tecnología. Edición al español de Quintanilla, I. Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1956). Meditación de la Técnica. Madrid: Revista de Occidente. Colección Arquero.
Pruyt, E. (2006). “What is System Dynamics? A paradigmatic Inquiry.” Universiteit Brussel, pp. 1-29.
Rodríguez, R. (1996). La Entrevista de El Spiegel. Madrid: Tecnos.
Sloterdijk, P. (1993). Weltfremdheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
- (2001). Nicht gerettet. Versuche nach Heidegger. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
- (2006). Esferas III. Espumas. Madrid: Ediciones Siruela.
- (2014). Fiscalidad Voluntaria y Responsabilidad Ciudadana. Madrid: Ediciones Siruela.
- (2019). Encantamientos en prosa. Conversando con Peter Sloterdijk. Leonidas Montes, editor. Santiago de Chile, FCE y CEP.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics. Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Massachusetts: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
- (2002). “All Models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist”. Massachusetts: System Dynamics Review, 18(4), pp. 501-531.
- Sterman, J., et al. (2018). Ratcheting Ambition to Limit Warming to 1.5°C-trade-offs Between Emission Reductions and Carbon Dioxide Removal. Environmental Research Letters, 13:6.
- Sterman, J., et al. (2018). Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy. Environmental Research Letters, 13(1).
- Sterman, J., et al. (2017). Three years to safeguard our climate. Nature, 546, pp. 593-595.
- Sterman, J., et al. (2017). Stretch Goals and the Distribution of Organizational Performance. Organization Science, 28(3), pp. 395-410.
- Sterman, J., et al. (2016). How to Save a Leaky Ship: Capability Traps and the Failure of Win-Win Investments in Sustainability and Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2, pp. 7-32.
