Co-construcción en proyectos de generación distribuida con energía solar: participación de la comunidad en el proyecto Ayllu Solar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35588/pv0y3513Abstract
The level of participation of communities in distributed generation projects is a fundamental challenge for energy transition processes. Based on the experience of the Ayllu Solar project in the implementation of the co-construction methodology, this article debate on the participation of the communities in the development of energy projects, identifying learning and challenges. In this context, it is emphasized that for the success of the participatory processes it is necessary to have a thorough diagnosis of the territory; develop a proposal with sociocultural relevance; establish clear rules for the operation of work teams; work with organizations previously constituted, among others key aspects. In turn, it was possible to identify four types of barriers for the implementation of the Methodology in the territory: temporal, territorial, educational and sociocultural. Finally. two critical aspects were identified for the development of projects of this type: the tension caused by the existence of several understandings in the multidisciplinary teams on the scope of local participation, on the other hand, the contradictions and difficulties marked by the distrust generated by projects that are promoted local development, but based on the development of extractive industry. Both aspects pose great challenges for the participation and sustainability of this type of projects.
Downloads
References
Alvial-Palavicino, C.; Garrido-Echeverría, N.; Jiménez-Estévez, G.; Reyes, L. y Palma-Behnke, R. (2011). "A Methodology for Community Engagement in the Introduction of Renewable Based Smart Microgrid". Energy for Sustainable Development 15(3), 314-323.
Arnstein, S.R. (1969). "A Ladder Of Citizen Participation". Journal of the American Planning Association 35(776502344), 216-224.
Davidson, S. (1998). "Spinning the wheel". Community Planning, 1262 [en línea] Disponible en: https://www.sarkissian.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Davidson-Spinning-wheel-article1998.pdf (consultado el 01/03/18).
Fletcher, A. (2014). Meaningful student involvement: Guide to Inclusive School Change. 2da. edición. The freechild Project [en línea] Disponible en: https://soundout.org/wp-content /uploads/2015/07/MSI_Guide_to_Inclusive_School_Change.pdf (consultado el 01/03/18).
Geels, F. W. (2010). "Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the Multi-Level Perspective". Research Policy 39(4), 495-510.
Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Innocenti essays (Vol. 4). [ en línea] Disponible en: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/childrens _participation.pdf (consultado el 01/03/18).
IAP. (2007). "Public participation spectrum". Wollongong, Australia [en línea] Disponible en: http://www.fgcu.edu/Provost/files/IAP_Public_Participation_Spectrum.pdf (consultado el 01/03/18).
INE. (2018). 2da Entrega resultados definitivos CENSO 2017. Santiago de Chile, INE.
Jiménez-Estévez, G.; Palma-Behnke, R.; Ortiz-Villalba, D.; Nuñez-Mata, O. y Silva-Montes, C. (2014). "It Takes a Village: Social SCADA and Approaches to Community Engagement in Isolated Microgrids". IEEE Power & Energy Magazine 122(4), 60-69.
Leigh, S. y Griesemer, J.R. (1989). "Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science 19(3), 387-420.
Miller, C.A.; Richter, J. y O’Leary, J. (2015). Socio-Energy Systems Design: a Policy Framework for Energy Transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 6, 29-40.
Palma-Behnke, R.; Montedonico, M. y Nuñez, O. (2016). "Opportunities and Challenges for the Integration of Solar Energy in Latin American Communities". En Plenary Session IEEE CONCAPAN XXXVI. San José, Costa Rica: IEEE.
Pino, A.; Salgado, M.; Escobar, R.A.; Pereira, E.B.; Ramos, F. y Boland, J. (2015). "Estimating the Potential for Solar Energy Utilization in Chile by Satellite-Derived Data and Ground Station Measurements". Solar Energy, Elsevier 121, 139-151.
Ropohl, G. (1999). "Philosophy of sociotechnical systems". Society for Philosophy and Technology 4(3) [en línea] Disponible en: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals /SPT/v4_n3html/ROPOHL.html (consultado el 01/03/18).
Rosenbloom, D.; Berton, H. y Meadowcroft, J. (2016). "Framing the Sun: a Discursive Approach to Understanding Multi-Dimensional Interactions within Socio-Technical Transitions through the Case of Solar Electricity in Ontario, Canada". Research Policy 45(6), 1275-1290.
Turnhout, E.; Behagel, J.; Ferranti, F. y Beunen, R. (2015). "The Construction of Legitimacy in European Nature Policy: Expertise and Participation in the Service of Cost-EffectivenessE. Environmental Politics 24(3), 461-480.
Ulli-Beer, S. (2013). Dynamic Governance of Energy Technology Change. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag [en línea] Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39753-0 (consultado el 01/03/18).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Marcia Montedonico, Francisca Herrera-Neira, Andrés Marconi, Anahí Urquiza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
